Soil microbial systems respond differentially to tetracycline, sulfamonomethoxine, and ciprofloxacin entering soil under pot experimental conditions alone and in combination

TitleSoil microbial systems respond differentially to tetracycline, sulfamonomethoxine, and ciprofloxacin entering soil under pot experimental conditions alone and in combination
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsMa J.W, Lin H., Sun W.C, Wang Q., Yu Q.G, Zhao Y.H, Fu J.R
JournalEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research
Volume21
Pagination7436-7448
Date PublishedJun
Type of ArticleArticle
ISBN Number0944-1344
Accession NumberWOS:000337086300019
KeywordsABUNDANCE, Antibiotics dissipation, Community structure, contaminated pig manure, degradation, denitrifying bacteria, diversity, Environmental Sciences & Ecology, GENES, land-use, MicroResp, Multiple antibiotics, Nitrogen-cycling gene, Soil microbial system, SULFADIAZINE, Veterinary antibiotics
Abstract

This study investigated soil microbial responses to the application of tetracycline (TC), sulfamonomethoxine (SMM), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) alone and in combination in a soil culture pot experiment conducted at Hangzhou, China. Multiple approaches were applied for a better and complete depiction. Among the three antibiotics, SMM has a lowest dissipation and shows a most dramatic inhibition on microbial community and metabolism diversity. The combined application (AM) of SMM, CIP, and TC improved the dissipation of each antibiotic; similarly, SMM- and CIP-resistant bacteria showed larger populations in the AM than all single applications. Soils accumulated a large content of NO3-N at day 20 after multi-antibiotics perturbation. All antibiotics stimulated soil basal respirations and inhibited soil metabolism diversity, whereas the interruption exerted by SMM and AM lasted for a longer time. Six nitrogen-cycling genes including chiA, amoA, nifH, nirK, nirS, and narG were quantified and found to decrease owing to both single- and multi-antibiotics perturbation. Overall, AM was most interruptive for soils, followed by SMM perturbation, while other antibiotics could be less interruptive. These results provide systematic insights into how soil microbial systems would shift under each single- or multi-antibiotics perturbation.

Short TitleEnviron. Sci. Pollut. Res.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.
Alternate JournalEnviron. Sci. Pollut. Res.
stdClass Object
(
    [vid] => 727
    [uid] => 11
    [title] => Soil microbial systems respond differentially to tetracycline, sulfamonomethoxine, and ciprofloxacin entering soil under pot experimental conditions alone and in combination
    [log] => 
    [status] => 1
    [comment] => 0
    [promote] => 1
    [sticky] => 0
    [nid] => 599
    [type] => biblio
    [language] => und
    [created] => 1656000347
    [changed] => 1656000347
    [tnid] => 0
    [translate] => 0
    [revision_timestamp] => 1656000347
    [revision_uid] => 11
    [biblio_type] => 102
    [biblio_number] => 12
    [biblio_other_number] => 
    [biblio_sort_title] => Soil microbial systems respond differentially to tetracycline su
    [biblio_secondary_title] => Environmental Science and Pollution Research
    [biblio_tertiary_title] => 
    [biblio_edition] => 
    [biblio_publisher] => 
    [biblio_place_published] => 
    [biblio_year] => 2014
    [biblio_volume] => 21
    [biblio_pages] => 7436-7448
    [biblio_date] => Jun
    [biblio_isbn] => 0944-1344
    [biblio_lang] => English
    [biblio_abst_e] => This study investigated soil microbial responses to the application of tetracycline (TC), sulfamonomethoxine (SMM), and ciprofloxacin (CIP) alone and in combination in a soil culture pot experiment conducted at Hangzhou, China. Multiple approaches were applied for a better and complete depiction. Among the three antibiotics, SMM has a lowest dissipation and shows a most dramatic inhibition on microbial community and metabolism diversity. The combined application (AM) of SMM, CIP, and TC improved the dissipation of each antibiotic; similarly, SMM- and CIP-resistant bacteria showed larger populations in the AM than all single applications. Soils accumulated a large content of NO3-N at day 20 after multi-antibiotics perturbation. All antibiotics stimulated soil basal respirations and inhibited soil metabolism diversity, whereas the interruption exerted by SMM and AM lasted for a longer time. Six nitrogen-cycling genes including chiA, amoA, nifH, nirK, nirS, and narG were quantified and found to decrease owing to both single- and multi-antibiotics perturbation. Overall, AM was most interruptive for soils, followed by SMM perturbation, while other antibiotics could be less interruptive. These results provide systematic insights into how soil microbial systems would shift under each single- or multi-antibiotics perturbation.
    [biblio_abst_f] => 
    [biblio_full_text] => 0
    [biblio_url] => 
    [biblio_issue] => 
    [biblio_type_of_work] => Article
    [biblio_accession_number] => WOS:000337086300019
    [biblio_call_number] => 
    [biblio_notes] => ISI Document Delivery No.: AI7PN
Times Cited: 36
Cited Reference Count: 45
Ma, Junwei Lin, Hui Sun, Wanchun Wang, Qiang Yu, Qiaogang Zhao, Yuhua Fu, Jianrong
Lin, Hui/0000-0002-5446-8069
Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest [201303091]; Scientific and Technological Innovation Capacity Improvement Programmer of the Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences; National Key Technologies R&D Program of China [2012BAC17B04]
This study was supported by the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201303091), the Scientific and Technological Innovation Capacity Improvement Programmer of the Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, and the National Key Technologies R&D Program of China (2012BAC17B04).
43
15
170
Springer heidelberg
Heidelberg
1614-7499 [biblio_custom1] => [biblio_custom2] => [biblio_custom3] => [biblio_custom4] => [biblio_custom5] => [biblio_custom6] => [biblio_custom7] => [biblio_research_notes] => [biblio_number_of_volumes] => [biblio_short_title] => Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. [biblio_alternate_title] => Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. [biblio_original_publication] => [biblio_reprint_edition] => [biblio_translated_title] => [biblio_section] => [biblio_citekey] => 599 [biblio_coins] => [biblio_doi] => [biblio_issn] => [biblio_auth_address] => [Ma, Junwei; Lin, Hui; Sun, Wanchun; Wang, Qiang; Yu, Qiaogang; Fu, Jianrong] Zhejiang Acad Agr Sci, Inst Environm Resource & Soil Fertilizer, Hangzhou 310021, Zhejiang, Peoples R China. [Zhao, Yuhua] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Microbiol, Coll Life Sci, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
Fu, JR (corresponding author), Zhejiang Acad Agr Sci, Inst Environm Resource & Soil Fertilizer, Hangzhou 310021, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
fujr@mail.zaas.ac.cn [biblio_remote_db_name] => [biblio_remote_db_provider] => [biblio_label] => [biblio_access_date] => [biblio_refereed] => [biblio_md5] => f738b76198a5620a27dbbbf9e23fc25f [biblio_formats] => Array ( [biblio_abst_e] => full_html [biblio_abst_f] => full_html [biblio_notes] => full_html [biblio_research_notes] => full_html [biblio_custom1] => full_html [biblio_custom2] => full_html [biblio_custom3] => full_html [biblio_custom4] => full_html [biblio_custom5] => full_html [biblio_custom6] => full_html [biblio_custom7] => full_html [biblio_coins] => full_html [biblio_auth_address] => full_html ) [biblio_type_name] => Journal Article [biblio_contributors] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [nid] => 599 [vid] => 727 [cid] => 601 [auth_type] => 1 [auth_category] => 1 [rank] => 0 [merge_cid] => 0 [aka] => 0 [alt_form] => 0 [drupal_uid] => [name] => Ma, J. W. [lastname] => Ma [firstname] => J. [prefix] => [suffix] => [initials] => W. [affiliation] => [literal] => 0 [md5] => 24c2fe387e63a032937a170c5d62a26c ) [1] => Array ( [nid] => 599 [vid] => 727 [cid] => 595 [auth_type] => 1 [auth_category] => 1 [rank] => 1 [merge_cid] => 0 [aka] => 0 [alt_form] => 0 [drupal_uid] => [name] => Lin, H. [lastname] => Lin [firstname] => H. [prefix] => [suffix] => [initials] => [affiliation] => [literal] => 0 [md5] => 3076cd61741c8d062510a36fadeade5b ) [2] => Array ( [nid] => 599 [vid] => 727 [cid] => 596 [auth_type] => 1 [auth_category] => 1 [rank] => 2 [merge_cid] => 0 [aka] => 0 [alt_form] => 0 [drupal_uid] => [name] => Sun, W. C. [lastname] => Sun [firstname] => W. [prefix] => [suffix] => [initials] => C. [affiliation] => [literal] => 0 [md5] => e814b9e0af381ab37dc240e16082c7b5 ) [3] => Array ( [nid] => 599 [vid] => 727 [cid] => 1201 [auth_type] => 1 [auth_category] => 1 [rank] => 3 [merge_cid] => 0 [aka] => 0 [alt_form] => 0 [drupal_uid] => [name] => Wang, Q. [lastname] => Wang [firstname] => Q. [prefix] => [suffix] => [initials] => [affiliation] => [literal] => 0 [md5] => 719c96fbd22b85a177086fb82a7ad244 ) [4] => Array ( [nid] => 599 [vid] => 727 [cid] => 1205 [auth_type] => 1 [auth_category] => 1 [rank] => 4 [merge_cid] => 0 [aka] => 0 [alt_form] => 0 [drupal_uid] => [name] => Yu, Q. G. [lastname] => Yu [firstname] => Q. [prefix] => [suffix] => [initials] => G. [affiliation] => [literal] => 0 [md5] => 286ae2468cd213b2a718bc0cdef7c4b9 ) [5] => Array ( [nid] => 599 [vid] => 727 [cid] => 1662 [auth_type] => 1 [auth_category] => 1 [rank] => 5 [merge_cid] => 0 [aka] => 0 [alt_form] => 0 [drupal_uid] => [name] => Zhao, Y. H. [lastname] => Zhao [firstname] => Y. [prefix] => [suffix] => [initials] => H. [affiliation] => [literal] => 0 [md5] => adae478f0871871e5098d5fbbe129be9 ) [6] => Array ( [nid] => 599 [vid] => 727 [cid] => 599 [auth_type] => 1 [auth_category] => 1 [rank] => 6 [merge_cid] => 0 [aka] => 0 [alt_form] => 0 [drupal_uid] => [name] => Fu, J. R. [lastname] => Fu [firstname] => J. [prefix] => [suffix] => [initials] => R. [affiliation] => [literal] => 0 [md5] => d0466de1d21773cd42126abea32e52e0 ) ) [biblio_keywords] => Array ( [812] => ABUNDANCE [1962] => Antibiotics dissipation [119] => Community structure [1964] => contaminated pig manure [1003] => degradation [1965] => denitrifying bacteria [132] => diversity [450] => Environmental Sciences & Ecology [585] => GENES [154] => land-use [21] => MicroResp [1961] => Multiple antibiotics [1963] => Nitrogen-cycling gene [1960] => Soil microbial system [810] => SULFADIAZINE [963] => Veterinary antibiotics ) [body] => Array ( ) [rdf_mapping] => Array ( [rdftype] => Array ( [0] => sioc:Item [1] => foaf:Document ) [title] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:title ) ) [created] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:date [1] => dc:created ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [changed] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => dc:modified ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) [body] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => content:encoded ) ) [uid] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:has_creator ) [type] => rel ) [name] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => foaf:name ) ) [comment_count] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:num_replies ) [datatype] => xsd:integer ) [last_activity] => Array ( [predicates] => Array ( [0] => sioc:last_activity_date ) [datatype] => xsd:dateTime [callback] => date_iso8601 ) ) [name] => clare.cameron [picture] => 0 [data] => a:13:{s:16:"ckeditor_default";s:1:"t";s:20:"ckeditor_show_toggle";s:1:"t";s:14:"ckeditor_width";s:4:"100%";s:13:"ckeditor_lang";s:2:"en";s:18:"ckeditor_auto_lang";s:1:"t";s:19:"biblio_show_profile";i:0;s:19:"biblio_my_pubs_menu";i:0;s:21:"biblio_contributor_id";s:1:"0";s:22:"biblio_id_change_count";s:1:"0";s:17:"biblio_user_style";s:6:"system";s:18:"biblio_baseopenurl";s:0:"";s:18:"biblio_openurl_sid";s:0:"";s:19:"biblio_crossref_pid";s:0:"";} [entity_view_prepared] => 1 )