| Title | Microbial function in adjacent subtropical forest and agricultural soil |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2013 |
| Authors | Brackin R., Robinson N., Lakshmanan P., Schmidt S. |
| Journal | Soil Biology and Biochemistry |
| Volume | 57 |
| Pagination | 68-77 |
| Date Published | Feb |
| ISBN Number | 0038-0717 |
| Accession Number | WOS:000317247100008 |
| Keywords | bacterial communities, biological-properties, clpp, Community structure, cropping, deforestation, dynamics, enzyme-activities, enzymes, land-use, litter decomposition, nitrification, nitrogen dynamics, organic-matter, rotation breaks, soil health, sugarcane, yield decline |
| Abstract | Soil microbial communities and their activities are altered by land use change; however impacts and extent of these alterations are often unclear. We investigated the functional responses of soil microbes in agricultural soil under sugarcane and corresponding native soil under Eucalyptus forest to additions of contrasting plant litter derived from soybean, sugarcane and Eucalyptus in a microcosm system, using a suite of complimentary techniques including enzyme assays and community level physiological profiles (CLPP). Initially agricultural soil had 50% less microbial biomass and lower enzyme activities than forest soil, but significantly higher nitrification rates. In response to litter addition, microbial biomass increased up to 11-fold in agricultural soil, but only 1.8-fold in forest soil, suggesting a prevalence of rapidly proliferating 'r' and slower growing 'K' strategists in the respective soils. Litter-driven change in microbial biomass and activities were short lived, largely returning to pre-litter addition levels by day 150. Decomposition rates of sugarcane and soybean litter as estimated via CO2 production were lower in agricultural than in forest soil, but decomposition of more recalcitrant Eucalyptus litter was similar in both soils, contradicting the notion that microbial communities specialise in decomposing litter of the dominant local plant species. Enzyme activities and community level physiological profiles (CLPP) were closely correlated to microbial biomass and overall CO2 production in the agricultural soil but not the forest soil, suggesting contrasting relationships between microbial population dynamics and activity in the two soils. Activities of enzymes that break down complex biopolymers, such as protease, cellulase and phenol oxidase were similar or higher in the agricultural soil, which suggests that the production of extracellular biopolymer-degrading enzymes was not a factor limiting litter decomposition. Enzyme and CLPP analyses produced contrasting profiles of microbial activity in the two soils; however the combination of both analyses offers additional insights into the changes in microbial function and community dynamics that occur after conversion of forest to agricultural land. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
| Short Title | Soil Biol. Biochem. |
| Alternate Journal | Soil Biol Biochem<br/>Soil Biol Biochem |
stdClass Object
(
[vid] => 287
[uid] => 1
[title] => Microbial function in adjacent subtropical forest and agricultural soil
[log] =>
[status] => 1
[comment] => 2
[promote] => 1
[sticky] => 0
[nid] => 287
[type] => biblio
[language] => und
[created] => 1569417020
[changed] => 1569417020
[tnid] => 0
[translate] => 0
[revision_timestamp] => 1569417020
[revision_uid] => 11
[biblio_type] => 102
[biblio_number] =>
[biblio_other_number] =>
[biblio_sort_title] => Microbial function in adjacent subtropical forest and agricultur
[biblio_secondary_title] => Soil Biology and Biochemistry
[biblio_tertiary_title] =>
[biblio_edition] =>
[biblio_publisher] =>
[biblio_place_published] =>
[biblio_year] => 2013
[biblio_volume] => 57
[biblio_pages] => 68-77
[biblio_date] => Feb
[biblio_isbn] => 0038-0717
[biblio_lang] => English
[biblio_abst_e] => Soil microbial communities and their activities are altered by land use change; however impacts and extent of these alterations are often unclear. We investigated the functional responses of soil microbes in agricultural soil under sugarcane and corresponding native soil under Eucalyptus forest to additions of contrasting plant litter derived from soybean, sugarcane and Eucalyptus in a microcosm system, using a suite of complimentary techniques including enzyme assays and community level physiological profiles (CLPP). Initially agricultural soil had 50% less microbial biomass and lower enzyme activities than forest soil, but significantly higher nitrification rates. In response to litter addition, microbial biomass increased up to 11-fold in agricultural soil, but only 1.8-fold in forest soil, suggesting a prevalence of rapidly proliferating 'r' and slower growing 'K' strategists in the respective soils. Litter-driven change in microbial biomass and activities were short lived, largely returning to pre-litter addition levels by day 150. Decomposition rates of sugarcane and soybean litter as estimated via CO2 production were lower in agricultural than in forest soil, but decomposition of more recalcitrant Eucalyptus litter was similar in both soils, contradicting the notion that microbial communities specialise in decomposing litter of the dominant local plant species. Enzyme activities and community level physiological profiles (CLPP) were closely correlated to microbial biomass and overall CO2 production in the agricultural soil but not the forest soil, suggesting contrasting relationships between microbial population dynamics and activity in the two soils. Activities of enzymes that break down complex biopolymers, such as protease, cellulase and phenol oxidase were similar or higher in the agricultural soil, which suggests that the production of extracellular biopolymer-degrading enzymes was not a factor limiting litter decomposition. Enzyme and CLPP analyses produced contrasting profiles of microbial activity in the two soils; however the combination of both analyses offers additional insights into the changes in microbial function and community dynamics that occur after conversion of forest to agricultural land. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[biblio_abst_f] =>
[biblio_full_text] => 0
[biblio_url] =>
[biblio_issue] =>
[biblio_type_of_work] =>
[biblio_accession_number] => WOS:000317247100008
[biblio_call_number] =>
[biblio_notes] => 121lu
Times Cited:12
Cited References Count:62
[biblio_custom1] =>
[biblio_custom2] =>
[biblio_custom3] =>
[biblio_custom4] =>
[biblio_custom5] =>
[biblio_custom6] =>
[biblio_custom7] =>
[biblio_research_notes] =>
[biblio_number_of_volumes] =>
[biblio_short_title] => Soil Biol. Biochem.
[biblio_alternate_title] => Soil Biol Biochem
Soil Biol Biochem
[biblio_original_publication] =>
[biblio_reprint_edition] =>
[biblio_translated_title] =>
[biblio_section] =>
[biblio_citekey] => 287
[biblio_coins] =>
[biblio_doi] =>
[biblio_issn] =>
[biblio_auth_address] => Univ Queensland, Sch Agr & Food Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
BSES Ltd, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia
[biblio_remote_db_name] =>
[biblio_remote_db_provider] =>
[biblio_label] =>
[biblio_access_date] =>
[biblio_refereed] =>
[biblio_md5] => 3d29cfa0a66f7303ccad4b5435e06429
[biblio_formats] => Array
(
[biblio_abst_e] => full_html
[biblio_abst_f] => full_html
[biblio_notes] => full_html
[biblio_research_notes] => full_html
[biblio_custom1] => full_html
[biblio_custom2] => full_html
[biblio_custom3] => full_html
[biblio_custom4] => full_html
[biblio_custom5] => full_html
[biblio_custom6] => full_html
[biblio_custom7] => full_html
[biblio_coins] => full_html
[biblio_auth_address] => full_html
)
[biblio_type_name] => Journal Article
[biblio_contributors] => Array
(
[0] => Array
(
[nid] => 287
[vid] => 287
[cid] => 253
[auth_type] => 1
[auth_category] => 1
[rank] => 0
[merge_cid] => 0
[aka] => 0
[alt_form] => 0
[drupal_uid] =>
[name] => Brackin, R.
[lastname] => Brackin
[firstname] => R.
[prefix] =>
[suffix] =>
[initials] =>
[affiliation] =>
[literal] => 0
[md5] => 19d64681ce64c416b0be61752028f105
)
[1] => Array
(
[nid] => 287
[vid] => 287
[cid] => 254
[auth_type] => 1
[auth_category] => 1
[rank] => 1
[merge_cid] => 0
[aka] => 0
[alt_form] => 0
[drupal_uid] =>
[name] => Robinson, N.
[lastname] => Robinson
[firstname] => N.
[prefix] =>
[suffix] =>
[initials] =>
[affiliation] =>
[literal] => 0
[md5] => 1be2808c98788ae6f6f9da4a64694f3f
)
[2] => Array
(
[nid] => 287
[vid] => 287
[cid] => 255
[auth_type] => 1
[auth_category] => 1
[rank] => 2
[merge_cid] => 0
[aka] => 0
[alt_form] => 0
[drupal_uid] =>
[name] => Lakshmanan, P.
[lastname] => Lakshmanan
[firstname] => P.
[prefix] =>
[suffix] =>
[initials] =>
[affiliation] =>
[literal] => 0
[md5] => be7f5e3d80506cc3c0ba2d932b876c35
)
[3] => Array
(
[nid] => 287
[vid] => 287
[cid] => 256
[auth_type] => 1
[auth_category] => 1
[rank] => 3
[merge_cid] => 0
[aka] => 0
[alt_form] => 0
[drupal_uid] =>
[name] => Schmidt, S.
[lastname] => Schmidt
[firstname] => S.
[prefix] =>
[suffix] =>
[initials] =>
[affiliation] =>
[literal] => 0
[md5] => 5e8c11c5284d2d09bb9747393be96b51
)
)
[biblio_keywords] => Array
(
[263] => bacterial communities
[155] => biological-properties
[28] => clpp
[119] => Community structure
[378] => cropping
[379] => deforestation
[376] => dynamics
[174] => enzyme-activities
[171] => enzymes
[154] => land-use
[164] => litter decomposition
[380] => nitrification
[382] => nitrogen dynamics
[51] => organic-matter
[383] => rotation breaks
[31] => soil health
[377] => sugarcane
[381] => yield decline
)
[body] => Array
(
)
[rdf_mapping] => Array
(
[rdftype] => Array
(
[0] => sioc:Item
[1] => foaf:Document
)
[title] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => dc:title
)
)
[created] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => dc:date
[1] => dc:created
)
[datatype] => xsd:dateTime
[callback] => date_iso8601
)
[changed] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => dc:modified
)
[datatype] => xsd:dateTime
[callback] => date_iso8601
)
[body] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => content:encoded
)
)
[uid] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => sioc:has_creator
)
[type] => rel
)
[name] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => foaf:name
)
)
[comment_count] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => sioc:num_replies
)
[datatype] => xsd:integer
)
[last_activity] => Array
(
[predicates] => Array
(
[0] => sioc:last_activity_date
)
[datatype] => xsd:dateTime
[callback] => date_iso8601
)
)
[name] => admin
[picture] => 0
[data] => a:14:{s:7:"overlay";i:0;s:16:"ckeditor_default";s:1:"t";s:20:"ckeditor_show_toggle";s:1:"t";s:14:"ckeditor_width";s:4:"100%";s:13:"ckeditor_lang";s:2:"en";s:18:"ckeditor_auto_lang";s:1:"t";s:19:"biblio_show_profile";i:0;s:19:"biblio_my_pubs_menu";i:0;s:21:"biblio_contributor_id";s:1:"0";s:22:"biblio_id_change_count";s:1:"0";s:17:"biblio_user_style";s:6:"system";s:18:"biblio_baseopenurl";s:0:"";s:18:"biblio_openurl_sid";s:0:"";s:19:"biblio_crossref_pid";s:0:"";}
[entity_view_prepared] => 1
)